http://slightly.net/improv/?p=126 Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:52:06 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41 http://slightly.net/improv/?p=126#comment-78 Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:28:51 +0000 http://slightly.net/improv/?p=126#comment-78 http://www.chenghsin.com/pdf/ci-brochure.pdf

]]> http://slightly.net/improv/?p=126#comment-75 Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:25:50 +0000 http://slightly.net/improv/?p=126#comment-75 From the little that I know, language and rationality sit ‘outside’ of the contemplative and enlightenment experiences.
So there tends to be a lot of text that simply makes no sense, or seems to be some kind of twisty logic or even in the form of some annoyingly unquantifiable fable.
Let me know what else you find.
And in all serious I do know a guy…

]]> http://slightly.net/improv/?p=126#comment-73 Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:40:41 +0000 http://slightly.net/improv/?p=126#comment-73 Well – you’ve got a point. Although, my initial thinking was not so much about the experience but about getting a sense of the way ‘contemplatives’ use language to talk about the experience.

]]> http://slightly.net/improv/?p=126#comment-70 Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:36:40 +0000 http://slightly.net/improv/?p=126#comment-70 No I meant that. Whats the point of a conceptual framework whern you can actually get to the experience?

]]> http://slightly.net/improv/?p=126#comment-67 Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:35:22 +0000 http://slightly.net/improv/?p=126#comment-67 Cynic.

]]> http://slightly.net/improv/?p=126#comment-64 Fri, 12 Jun 2009 05:55:18 +0000 http://slightly.net/improv/?p=126#comment-64 Maybe it’d be more effective to get an experiential hit of the contemp[lative work. I know a guy…

]]>